We are responsible for those who choose …
We are responsible for those whom we choose. This phrase is relevant not only to summarize the past five years. On the eve of the coming five-year plan this statement should serve as a warning. To be entitled to call them to account, must have the courage to share with them the responsibility. They are what we allow them to be. This lesson has yet to learn. Interim results of the great political contest was persuaded, however not in demand rigor.
Poll January 17 predictably drew a line under the era of Viktor Yushchenko. The end of this era - a medical fact, no matter how desperately tried to argue with a merciless diagnosis otmuchivshiysya guarantor. However, “age” - too loud word to describe the reign of Viktor Andreyevich. For example, the presidency of Leonid Kravchuk, much less long, looks brighter and instructive. To assess the cadence Yushchenko, perhaps, better fit the word “episode”. In these five years, instead of many things and all, but always scrappy, crumpled, and unfounded polumernogo. Politics resembled a set of episodes that never became full-metrazhnoy picture. Everything was sporadic - from defections to sacrifice. Nedorassledovannye criminal cases, unfinished objects nedoraspuschenny Parliament nedosformirovannaya coalition nedoprovedennaya constitutional reform. Nedorazvalennaya control system. In the process of breaking passionate superpower steering our political elites (every little) have demonstrated remarkable ingenuity and tireless energy, but, thank God, was not developed until the end of that. Although fairly successful.
Sprinkle ashes on his head - not in our national tradition. We obtained much better to sow. Not always what we sow, unfortunately, is reasonable and kind. But, fortunately, it is not forever.
The latest national chronicle episode Yushchenko “is only a short chapter. Unfinished tale of Cinderella, which we enthusiastically helped turn into a princess, only to allow the appeal to an indifferent stepmother. But rats and Garbuz have remained in their former places in its original shape. We quickly realized that not magicians, but only learn. Learn more we turned laziness. But we deserve better. We have a lot more.
authorities realize that. She was afraid. No wonder at the sunset of his reign Leonid Kuchma”s presidential palace enclose a temporary fence. It is no accident at the beginning of his reign Viktor Andreevich turned the fence into stationary. If Yanukovych and Yulia Vladimirovna want to build a wall there, I personally would not be surprised.
Who would have neither succeeded departing from the affairs of the guarantor, we will have another, more terrible tale. It is desirable that it was more and more short. But, most importantly, like, so it changed the desolate end of the readers, writers and publishers. And brought to life very different characters. It is real. Extremely solid.
One highly respected person I sincerely tried to convince your humble servant, that in his time (years, perhaps decades later), Yushchenko will take its worthy place in history textbooks. As much has been done to them will be examined dispassionately and deservedly rated descendants.
God grant that he was right, my idealistic companion. I think he”s willing to support many of those who, five years after the Maidan wrongly felt crowd in a bright episode, somehow defective supreme director.
“That comes to power, Yanukovych1000(Timoshenko), you have a good word to remember Yushchenko.” Not too spread yesterday forecast today started slowly become popular. I can not and do not wish to speak on behalf of the entire country. I will say to himself: “I do not remember.” Never understand those who are nostalgic sigh, looking at the fences with full of hypocrisy “Forgive Danilich!”. Recognizing that, unlike his successor, Kuchma was head of state not only de jure but de facto.
According to another friend of mine, in the famous nickname of Yushchenko “hobbyist beekeeper” is the key word “amateur”. It is still incumbent president was simply not prepared for its mission, it”s true. However, the truth and that the people who marched behind him (like the people who stood beside him), did not do their utmost in order to force him to perform at least some promise.
very much that this campaign was the last choice illusory. Empower elected political non-existent virtues irresponsible. Do not recognize this error - is doubly irresponsible.
blue-white electorate influenced the formation of policy Yushchenko is not less than orange - on the formation of policies of Yanukovich. Without them there would be no confrontation Maidan. And do not be Maidan, there would be those elections in which no one is afraid myriarchs, interior troops and metal hedgehogs on the roads.
Yushchenko, Yanukovych, Tymoshenko - our common children, regardless of whether we recognize this relationship or not. We facilitate the ascension of one, even when the vote for another. We continue to make history, even when we do not believe in it. The threads of fate in our hands are still weak. A policy - only knots we tied ourselves and that we the strength to unravel.
The more people see the guilt in what was happening, the more people unlearn just look at what is happening. It is easier, we will survive the coming triumph of the mob, which is likely to replace the triumph of dullness. The sooner we move from the desire to see the “Ukraine without …” (Kuchma, Yushchenko, Yanukovych, Tymoshenko”s) desire to see “Ukraine with …”.
What we see, looking at the recent past? Time of hypocrisy. It was no worse and no better time kravchukovskogo guile and kuchminskogo time lies. But it was meaner, this time. Maidan Yushchenko unfairly turned into an icon for a good half of the country. Similarly, as for the other half of the country is just as wrongly turned into an icon of Yanukovych.
worship - a bad adviser. Rab hated ruler. Swain copies idol.
having obtained sybarite-ruler, the ruler-hedonist, we incomprehensible, irrational to copy it, having created a society spender, a country of consumers. Finally lost the habit of learning to build and deftly live beyond their means, spend not on the mind and steal not to rank. Head of State, who had a chance to save the country from energy dependence, but succumbed to the skilful at this dependence earn, deserve censure. And we? State and citizens simultaneously live on credit, debt and equally simultaneously go bankrupt.
Our trouble is that the longing for change society was a scout who is most intent on messianism and the least suitable for this. Our wines in that time we did not notice. And the word “our” refers not only to those who stood on the Maidan and (or) voted for Yushchenko. Appeal to the sociology of 2005 to convince how massive and how sincere was the expectation of change in all regions of the country. Such a loan is true of people”s trust republic has already received from a distant 91 th. Faith in the transformation imbued with honest and t1000hose who today cries out for the “orange plague”, unconsciously ashamed of their faith and knowledge of yesterday”s abandoning its share of responsibility for what is today the country has not come true.
Millions
fascinated watching his hand, shadowing of the cross, and the magic of this spectacle is not allowed to see the other, selflessly stealing his hand. And those who are now enthusiastically watching other psevdoidolom, picturesquely kissing the icon, run into the same sin. For the Bible forbids the sham piety.
And who will become easier by the fact that tomorrow the other hand will steal just as enthusiastically? And we expect the new cry - “on a white-blue plague”? It would be wrong. But so far nothing and no one gives reason to think that would be otherwise.
It was blasphemous time, idolize, we allowed them to defame the shrine. We were given a veneer of religious piety, fervently, for national pride - the glamorous shareware.
Personally, I do not have the slightest doubt that the Holodomor, steep, Zluky - for Yushchenko is not just empty words, in contrast to the same Kuchma, Yanukovych or Tymoshenko. With his love for the national genuine. But no less hypocritical.
Petlura named Viktor Andreyevich one of the symbols of the nation, not awarded the title Hero of Ukraine. But such an honor has fallen to the Minister Yuriy Melnik APC. Putting him on a par with Roman Shukhevych and Stepan Bandera, the president may have raised his contemporaries. I have humiliated myself. And part of the country, for which Shukhevych and Bandera - indeed heroes. At the same time humiliating in the eyes of the whole country itself the title of Hero of Ukraine.
Candle in the Holodomor Remembrance Day - it is beautiful and solemn. God willing, this ceremony will survive Victor A., and give occasion to remember his kind words of reverence for history and respect for the memory.
But
. Fun trial of the organizers of the Holodomor - not belated retribution, and certainly not an act of mourning for the innocent dead. This is - an insult. This - a logical continuation of another hypocrisy - Cyclopean monument to victims of hunger in the construction of which minion Viktor Andreevich habitually warmed his hands.
When Kuchma did not talk about the Holodomor. And it was sad. However, Kuchma about Holodomor is not joking. And the racy, like “Yushchenko”s Holodomor” - is not only a diagnosis of morals of society. This - the verdict of the patriotic policy Yushchenko. Which has become the opposite of Midas. He managed to turn into ashes everything he touched. But he chose to touch the shrines.
Is it any wonder that namolennye, holy places are increasingly becoming a place for a breakdown of golf courses and construction of fitness clubs.
What is the best gift for an impoverished culture? Pathos Kharkov “Art Arsenal” or republication L. Ukrainka? What is a more effective way to raise the national spirit? Domestic talented film about the glorious victories of the Ukrainian weapons or dressing up in baggy trousers honor guard?
Everyone expected that it was with the advent of Yushchenko in the Ukrainian consolidates fashion, appeared on the Maidan. But it was with the advent of Yushchenko and she ended. Until better times, which are bound to happen.
We ourselves have enabled him to sincerely believe he has the right to set market prices for eternal values. To preach the fight against corruption, covering bribes. Orate on the schema and humility, zhuiruya the money of the oligarchs and encouraging to the sae9dme members of his own family. Scream about the Constitution, every day of violation. Do not fear the power of criminals, bringing his arrival. Criticize the Kremlin, the Kremlin”s shadow encouraging the scheme and earning them.
Never before has the state was not so weak as in it, so talk a lot about strength. Even Moscow has never allowed herself to such derogatory intonations against the leadership of Ukraine. Just because this book, alas, did not give reason to make himself respected.
I do not know how moved Viktor Putin jokes, Medvedev”s notation and bawdy verses of the Christmas cartoons. I - as an affront to the country. Fortunately, I am not alone.
survived the era of unbelief, we will survive the episode razuverivaniya. We are doing more all that we do not kill.
Sergey Rakhmanin
Expert: Incred58ased quality requirements for petroleum products produced in Ukraine from January 1, 2011 to postpone
In 2009, MMK-Metiz cut output more than doubled to 309.2 thousand tons
Analytical review of the Forex market for the week of 18 to 22 January
Latin America: Friday was the day of sales
Belarusian customs officials complain that Russia has tightened its admission procedure at the border
Forecasts of analysts: After a negative open trades today can be expected to continue to fight for the 1400 points mark on MICEX
Following Friday the value of the MICEX Index reached 1410.38 points, which is 1.78% below the previous day”s close
Non-resident investor in no hurry to withdraw funds from Russian stock exchanges - this will keep selling securities on negative external background
Publicly traded on Russia”s stock market can be expected to break down to 1-1,5%



